Three Kings
- Image via Wikipedia
The first time I became aware of the difference between ‘search’ and ‘discovery’ was when I was attending a keynote of the founder of Stumbleupon Garrett Camp at The Next Web in 2007. And I’ve been interested in this subject since then. Search versus discovery can be illustrated by the following dichotomies between;
- knowing what you want versus not exactly knowing what you want,
- going to the information versus information coming to you,
- driven by popularity (math) versus driven by recommendation (social),
- wanting less (search results) versus more (options) is better,
- endpoint versus starting point.
More popular said; search is making the web effective and discovery makes the web fun (again!). Browsing the web in the pre-Google era was in fact discovering the web. Nowadays ‘search’ is still the most dominant theme, covering nearly everything we do with on the Web (finding something or someone). But most current innovations made in search are related to the discovery experience within search. Especially in the field of image/visual search (f.e. look at Google Swirl). So another dichotomy can be added;
- text-based (entry field) versus click-based (button, link).
To put it more straightforward; the future of search is discovery! The success of Twitter proves this thesis. Twitter is commonly seen as the most important player in the field of ‘realtime search’. But from a search/discovery perspective; Twitter is largely a discovery service!
- Information (Tweets) is coming to you;
- It’s driven by popularity (You choose whom you want to follow);
- A tweet acts as a starting point for further exploration (in a sense of thinking, linking etc.)
And if you’re following, you don’t have to search!
In the meantime, another term is making its appearance; recovery! Recovery refers to the activity of finding something you’ve seen before. F.e. you’ve seen a fragment on television, and you go to Youtube to find this fragment.
From a content perspective there are three ‘kings’;
King of Text is ‘Search’, the King of Images/Galleries is ‘Discovery’ and the King of Video is Recovery. And as in poker, the game immediately ends when one player has three kings!
Related articles by Zemanta
- Search, Discovery and Curation (newcommbiz.com)
- Sobees Launches Realtime Social Media Discovery Platform (techcrunch.com)
- StumbleUpon Recasts Itself As A Social Search Engine “Between Google And Twitter.” (techcrunch.com)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=40385010-1960-4dfc-9e97-b3ae50c40138)
What about video galleries? Discovery or Recovery?
I also think that the application of the content results is crucial from this point of view. Where search and recovery are leaning on a specific home portal (e.g. Google and YouTube), discovery is much more intertwined in existing content. A specific news fact, interest or person can become the starting point of a new discovery.
As a poker fan I have to put comments on your poker claim. Three kings do not automatically win the game. And if a player holds three kings in his hand, the dealer made a mistake. A mistake costs at least one small blind. You do not want that!
@ HJ
You’re interested in galleries (photos, videos) when you want to know more about a certain subject, i.e. if you want to explore! Galleries are definitely belonging to the field of ‘discovery’.
I agree that discovery is more intertwined with other content (context). You read or viewing something and you want to know more. A enormous opportunity for online publishers.
I’m not a poker fan and I don’t know much of the game, but you can loose a lot of money
But if the dealer has made this mistake, that game ends, doesn’t it?
Interesting division! Hope the three kings will become wise and find a way to combine services so we will be happy with a newborn concept. A concept that will fulfill our ever changing needs…
@Eldert
On second thoughts I think that the biblical metaphor is more suitable than the poker comparison. Thanks!